SynthesisDrugs & aging2020
Association between Statins Prescribed for Primary and Secondary Prevention and Major Adverse Cardiac Events among Older Adults with Frailty: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2020. The graph read 3 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 2 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as HR 0.58 (0.37 to 0.93) for all-cause mortality. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Among studies evaluating the association between statins for primary and secondary prevention and mortality, one study found statins were associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.93), while another study found they were not (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08).
Among studies evaluating the association between statins for primary and secondary prevention and mortality, one study found statins were associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.93), while another study found they were not (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08).
Furthermore, one study of statins used for secondary prevention found they were associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.21-0.39).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →13 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Appropriateness and Outcome of a Statin Deprescription Intervention in Hospitalized Frail Older Adults: A Retrospective Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of Nomogram to Predict Frailty for Older Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Aspirin and statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundStatins reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), however their clinical benefit for primary and secondary prevention among older adults with frailty is uncertain. This systematic review investigates whether statins prescribed for primary and secondary prevention are associated with reduced MACE among adults aged ≥ 65 years with frailty.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1 January 1952 and 1 January 2019 in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases. Studies that investigated the effect of statins on MACE among adults ≥ 65 years of age with a validated frailty assessment were included. Data were extracted from the papers as per a prepublished protocol, PROSPERO: CRD42019127486. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions tool.
resultsSix cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria; there were no randomised clinical trials. Among studies evaluating the association between statins for primary and secondary prevention and mortality, one study found statins were associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.93), while another study found they were not (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61-1.08). Furthermore, one study of statins used for secondary prevention found they were associated with reduced mortality (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.21-0.39). No studies investigated the effect of statins for primary prevention or the effect of statins on the frequency of MACE.
conclusionThis review identified only observational evidence that among older people with frailty, statins are associated with reduced mortality when prescribed for secondary prevention, and an absence of evidence evaluating statin therapy for primary prevention. Randomised trial data are needed to better inform the use of statins among older adults living with frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.