Trial reportArchives of internal medicine2009
Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Trial report in Archives of internal medicine, 2009. The graph read 3 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It reports registered trial NCT00375388. Cited by 160 papers, 19 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
RESULTS: Metformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3.07 kg [range, -3.85 to -2.28 kg]; P < .001), improved glycemic control (mean reduction in HbA(1c) level, 0.4% percentage point [95% CI, 0.55-0.25]; P < .001) (where CI indicates confidence interval), despite the aim of similar glycemic control in both groups, and reduced insulin requirements (mean reduction, 19.63 IU/d [95% CI, 24.91-14.36 IU/d]; P < .001).
The authors add: null
RESULTS: Metformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3.07 kg [range, -3.85 to -2.28 kg]; P < .001), improved glycemic control (mean reduction in HbA(1c) level, 0.4% percentage point [95% CI, 0.55-0.25]; P < .001) (where CI indicates confidence interval), despite the aim of similar glycemic control in both groups, and reduced insulin requirements (mean reduction, 19.63 IU/d [95% CI, 24.91-14.36 IU/d]; P < .001).
The authors add: null
RESULTS: Metformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3.07 kg [range, -3.85 to -2.28 kg]; P < .001), improved glycemic control (mean reduction in HbA(1c) level, 0.4% percentage point [95% CI, 0.55-0.25]; P < .001) (where CI indicates confidence interval), despite the aim of similar glycemic control in both groups, and reduced insulin requirements (mean reduction, 19.63 IU/d [95% CI, 24.91-14.36 IU/d]; P < .001).
The authors add: null
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Metformin×body weight & composition
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →19 readable studies in this cell: 7 favour the treatment, 6 find no difference, 6 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Metformin×glycemic control
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →40 readable studies in this cell: 41 favour the treatment, 13 find no difference, 7 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Study of Metformin HCL in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Intensively Treated With Insulin: a Treatment Strategy for Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and Safety of Metformin Glycinate Compared to Metformin Hydrochloride on the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes
Who cites it
160 citing papers in PubMed, 19 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 431 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist-based regimens compared with metformin-based regimens for preventing cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Genetic Evidence for the Benefits and Risks of Glucose-Lowering Drugs on Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: A Drug-Target Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of medical sciences · 2026 · on this mapPooled it
- Effect of metformin on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetes research and clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of metformin on adverse outcomes in T2DM patients: Systemic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Association of metformin monotherapy or combined therapy with cardiovascular risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021 · on this mapPooled it
- Age, sex, disease severity, and disease duration difference in placebo response: implications from a meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- (Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Metabolic effects of antihyperglycemic agents and mortality: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Scientific reports · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2020Guideline
- GLUcose COntrol Safety & Efficacy in type 2 DIabetes, a systematic review and NETwork meta-analysis.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Metformin induces significant reduction of body weight, total cholesterol and LDL levels in the elderly - A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2018Pooled it
- Impact of metformin on cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials among people with type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Glucose Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Different Regions of the World: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2015Pooled it
- Diabetes: glycaemic control in type 2 (drug treatments).BMJ clinical evidence · 2012Pooled it
- Reappraisal of metformin efficacy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.PLoS medicine · 2012 · on this mapPooled it
- Effect of intensive glucose lowering treatment on all cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and microvascular events in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Pooled it
- The use of metformin in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review of efficacy.Diabetologia · 2010 · on this mapPooled it
- Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010 · on this mapPooled it
- Practical guidance on intensification of insulin therapy with BIAsp 30: a consensus statement.International journal of clinical practice · 2009Guideline
- The Impact of Different Oral Antidiabetic Drugs on Insulin Pump Intensive Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Clinical Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Trial
100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundWe investigated whether metformin hydrochloride has sustained beneficial metabolic and (cardio) vascular effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).
methodsWe studied 390 patients treated with insulin in the outpatient clinics of 3 hospitals in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a follow-up period of 4.3 years. Either metformin hydrochloride, 850 mg, or placebo (1-3 times daily) was added to insulin therapy. The primary end point was an aggregate of microvascular and macrovascular morbidity and mortality. The secondary end points were microvascular and macrovascular morbidity and mortality, as separate aggregate scores. In addition, effects on hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), insulin requirement, lipid levels, blood pressure, body weight, and body mass index were analyzed.
resultsMetformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3.07 kg [range, -3.85 to -2.28 kg]; P < .001), improved glycemic control (mean reduction in HbA(1c) level, 0.4% percentage point [95% CI, 0.55-0.25]; P < .001) (where CI indicates confidence interval), despite the aim of similar glycemic control in both groups, and reduced insulin requirements (mean reduction, 19.63 IU/d [95% CI, 24.91-14.36 IU/d]; P < .001). Metformin was not associated with an improvement in the primary end point. It was, however, associated with an improvement in the secondary, macrovascular end point (hazard ratio, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .02), which was partly explained by the difference in weight. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 macrovascular end point was 16.1 (95% CI, 9.2-66.6).
conclusionsMetformin, added to insulin in patients with DM2, improved body weight, glycemic control, and insulin requirements but did not improve the primary end point. Metformin did, however, reduce the risk of macrovascular disease after a follow-up period of 4.3 years. These sustained beneficial effects support the policy to continue metformin treatment after the introduction of insulin in any patient with DM2, unless contraindicated. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00375388.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.