Trial reportCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2012

The effect of rosuvastatin on incident pneumonia: results from the JUPITER trial.

Victor Novack, Jean MacFadyen, Atul Malhotra, Yaniv Almog, Robert J Glynn, Paul M Ridker

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2012. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 1, finds no clear difference in 1. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
Cardiovascular eventsfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.810.67 to 0.97
In analyses restricted to events occurring before a cardiovascular event, pneumonia occurred in 203 participants given rosuvastatin and 250 given placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97).
Adverse events & safetyno clear difference · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.830.69 to 1.00
RESULTS: Among 17,802 trial participants followed for a median of 1.9 years, incident pneumonia was reported as an adverse event in 214 participants in the rosuvastatin group and 257 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.00).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×cardiovascular events

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

30 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.85This paper moves it by +0.01.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2012
HR 0.810.67 to 0.97
HR 0.710.56 to 0.90
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
HR 1.781.00 to 3.17
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19

Statins×adverse events & safety

InconclusiveOpen on the map →What to test next →

11 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 7 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.16contested · 1 family supports, 4 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.16This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2012
HR 0.830.69 to 1.00
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.690.11 to 2.95
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. SARS-CoV-2 and Pre-existing Vascular Diseases: Guilt by Association?Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Cardiovascular manifestation and treatment in COVID-19.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victor NovackClinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel. victorno@clalit.org.il
Jean MacFadyen
Atul Malhotra
Yaniv Almog
Robert J Glynn
Paul M Ridker
Soroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL093218NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL095491NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085188NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090897
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundEvidence from observational studies have raised the possibility that statin treatment reduces the incidence of certain bacterial infections, particularly pneumonia. We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of rosuvastatin to examine this hypothesis.

methodsWe analyzed data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin). In this trial, 17,802 healthy participants (men 50 years and older and women 60 and older) with a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level below 130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2.0 mg/L or greater were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin or placebo. We evaluated the incidence of pneumonia on an intention-to-treat basis by reviewing reports of adverse events from the study investigators, who were unaware of the treatment assignments.

resultsAmong 17,802 trial participants followed for a median of 1.9 years, incident pneumonia was reported as an adverse event in 214 participants in the rosuvastatin group and 257 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-1.00). In analyses restricted to events occurring before a cardiovascular event, pneumonia occurred in 203 participants given rosuvastatin and 250 given placebo (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97). Inclusion of recurrent pneumonia events did not modify this effect (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98), nor did adjustment for age, sex, smoking, metabolic syndrome, lipid levels and C-reactive protein level.

interpretationData from this randomized controlled trial support the hypothesis that statin treatment may modestly reduce the incidence of pneumonia. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial register no. NCT0023968.).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluorobenzenesFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIncidenceIntention to Treat AnalysisKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedCholesterol, LDLC-Reactive ProteinFluorobenzenesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPyrimidinesRosuvastatin CalciumSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID22431901
PMCPMC3328541
OpenAlexW2126100780

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.