Trial reportClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2026

Effects of Semaglutide on Body Composition and GFR: A Prespecified Analysis of the SMART Trial.

Hiddo J L Heerspink, Maria Soler, Jelle M Beernink, Niels Jongs, Secundino Cigarran, Josep M Cruzado, Maria Jesús Puchades, Marina López-Martínez, Ellen Apperloo, Femke Waanders and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2026. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 2. It reports registered trial NCT04889183. Cited by 1 paper.

2numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
-11.00 · no effect
Blood pressurefavours the treatment · against placebo · hypertension, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
change -0.90-1.60 to -0.10
Semaglutide compared with placebo changed extracellular water and systolic BP by -0.9 (95% CI, -1.6 to -0.1) L and -6.3 (95% CI, -10.9 to -1.7) mm Hg, respectively.
Body weight & compositionfavours the treatment · against placebo · hypertension, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
change -9.10-11.0 to -7.20
RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, semaglutide compared with placebo changed total body weight, lean body mass, and fat mass by -9.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -11.0 to -7.2), -2.5 (95% CI, -6.6 to 1.6), and -3.9 (95% CI, -7.8 to 0.0) kg, respectively.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

GLP-1 receptor agonists×blood pressure

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

10 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 3 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.50This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper125 enrolled · 2022
change -0.90-1.60 to -0.10
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ 0.36-1.02 to 1.73
NCT00781937422 enrolled · 2008
Treatment Contrast -2.72-4.69 to -0.76
NCT02492763176 enrolled · 2015
Δ -1.10-6.20 to 4.10
NCT04019197108 enrolled · 2019
β coefficient -0.05-0.10 to -0.01
NCT0488111060 enrolled · 2021
Δ -0.00-5.80 to 5.80

GLP-1 receptor agonists×body weight & composition

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 83 favour the treatment, 15 find no difference, 11 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.90replicated · 64 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.90This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
This paper125 enrolled · 2022
change -9.10-11.0 to -7.20
NCT012722193,731 enrolled · 2011
Δ -5.39-5.82 to -4.95
Δ -17.3-18.1 to -16.6
NCT017204463,297 enrolled · 2013
Δ -2.95-3.47 to -2.44
NCT035489351,961 enrolled · 2018
Δ -12.4-13.4 to -11.5
NCT039879191,879 enrolled · 2019
Δ -1.70-2.60 to -0.70
NCT026078651,864 enrolled · 2016
Δ -2.50-3.00 to -2.00
NCT056467061,407 enrolled · 2023
Δ -14.8-16.2 to -13.4
NCT018365231,398 enrolled · 2013
Δ -4.90-5.65 to -4.16
NCT035527571,210 enrolled · 2018
Δ -6.21-7.28 to -5.15
NCT007344741,202 enrolled · 2008
Δ -1.50-2.08 to -0.92
Δ -10.4-11.2 to -9.50
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ 14.38.37 to 20.3
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04889183 phase3completed

SeMaglutide and Albuminuria Reduction Trial in Obese Individuals Without Diabetes

Ran2022Enrolled125Registered outcomes10Posted comparisons0ConditionsAlbuminuria, ObesityArmsPlacebo, semaglutide
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. What the Scale Does Not Show: A Patient's Reflection on Semaglutide, Strength, and the SMART Trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3126-3730
Maria SolerDepartment of Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-0766
Jelle M BeerninkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4615-9012
Niels JongsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-3656
Secundino CigarranNephrology Service Hospital Ribera-Polusa Lugo, Lugo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9043-992
Josep M CruzadoDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1388-8558
Maria Jesús PuchadesDepartment of Nephrology, University Clinical Hospital, INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Marina López-MartínezDepartment of Nephrology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4284-831
Ellen ApperlooDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-0271-5796
Femke WaandersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Isala Zwolle, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-7732
Gozewijn D LavermanDepartment of Internal Medicine, ZiekenhuisGroep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8716-7115
Annemarie van der Aart-van der BeekHospital Pharmacy, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1473-3259
André P van BeekDepartment of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0335-8177
Jacobien C VerhaveDepartment Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Ziekenhuis, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Sofia B AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3000-2229
Roland E SchmiederDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital Erlangen Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2356-5883
Christoph WannerDepartment of Clinical Studies and Epidemiology. Comprehensive Heart Failure Center University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-5301
David Z I CherneyDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
José L GórrizDepartment of Nephrology, University Clinical Hospital, INCLIVA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1134-9051

Funding

Novo Nordisk n/a
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

key pointsTreatment with semaglutide compared with placebo for 24 weeks reduced lean body mass and fat mass in adults with CKD and overweight or obesity. Changes in lean body mass or fat mass during semaglutide treatment did not correlate with changes in creatinine or cystatin C‑eGFR or measured GFR. Semaglutide significantly reduced extracellular water and BP, and changes in BP correlated with extracellular water.

backgroundThe glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces hemoglobin A1c, body weight, BP, and GFR decline. Semaglutide may influence serum creatinine and cystatin C levels by nonkidney-related mechanisms and thereby affect eGFR. We studied the relationship between changes in body composition, eGFR and measured GFR (mGFR), and BP during semaglutide treatment.

methodsWe performed a prespecified analysis of a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial in 101 adults with CKD with overweight status or obesity and without type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomized to 24 weeks of semaglutide 2.4 mg/wk subcutaneously or matched placebo treatment. We measured GFR with iohexol clearance, estimated GFR with creatinine and cystatin C, and used bioimpedance spectroscopy to determine lean body mass, fat mass, and extracellular water.

resultsAfter 24 weeks of treatment, semaglutide compared with placebo changed total body weight, lean body mass, and fat mass by -9.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -11.0 to -7.2), -2.5 (95% CI, -6.6 to 1.6), and -3.9 (95% CI, -7.8 to 0.0) kg, respectively. No correlations were present between changes in total body weight, lean body mass, and fat mass with changes in eGFR (creatinine or cystatin C) or mGFR during semaglutide treatment (all Spearman correlation coefficients <0.23). Similar results were observed in multivariable adjusted analyses. Semaglutide compared with placebo changed extracellular water and systolic BP by -0.9 (95% CI, -1.6 to -0.1) L and -6.3 (95% CI, -10.9 to -1.7) mm Hg, respectively. Systolic BP changes during semaglutide treatment correlated with extracellular water changes (Spearman correlation 0.40; P = 0.005).

conclusionsSemaglutide reduced lean body mass and fat mass in patients with CKD with overweight status or obesity. These changes did not correlate with changes in creatinine or cystatin C eGFR or mGFR, suggesting that body weight reductions of 10% with semaglutide do not influence GFR estimates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04889183 .

Indexed as

Body CompositionGlomerular Filtration RateGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsKidneyOverweightRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAgedBlood PressureCreatinineCystatin CDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleCreatinineCystatin CGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsSemaglutideCKDclinical trialcreatinine clearanceGLP-1 receptor agonistslean body massmechanismsobesityrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID42308057
PMCPMC13379112

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.