SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2011
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011. The graph read 3 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 179 papers, 22 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Benefits were also seen in the reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83).
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD endpoints (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79).
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD endpoints (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Cardiac procedures & devices×cardiovascular events
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →3 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →14 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 9 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Erythrocyte-bound Apolipoprotein B After Withdrawal of Statin Therapy
Living With Statins - The Impact of Cholesterol Lowering Drugs on Health, Lifestyle and Well-being
Living With Statins - The Impact of Cholesterol Lowering Drugs on Health, Lifestyle and Well-being
LIFESTAT - Living With Statins, a Cross Sectional Study on the Impact of Cholesterol Lowering Drugs on Health, Lifestyle and Well-being
Who cites it
179 citing papers in PubMed, 22 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Strategies aiming to improve statin therapy adherence in older adults: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Serum Cholesterol Levels and Risk of Cardiovascular Death: A Systematic Review and a Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- 2018 Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2019Guideline
- Systematic review of the predictors of statin adherence for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Reporting bias in the literature on the associations of health-related behaviors and statins with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.PLoS biology · 2018Pooled it
- Digital health interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2015Pooled it
- Statins, cognition, and dementia—systematic review and methodological commentary.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2015Pooled it
- Do statins impair cognition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of general internal medicine · 2015Pooled it
- 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.Circulation · 2014 · on this mapGuideline
- Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013 · on this mapPooled it
- Statins and risk of diabetes: an analysis of electronic medical records to evaluate possible bias due to differential survival.Diabetes care · 2013Pooled it
- Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013 · on this mapPooled it
- Pooled it
- Primary prevention of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events with statins in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis.Drugs · 2012 · on this mapPooled it
- A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2012Pooled it
- The impact of statins on psychological wellbeing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2012Pooled it
- The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials.Lancet (London, England) · 2012 · on this mapPooled it
- Statin cost effectiveness in primary prevention: a systematic review of the recent cost-effectiveness literature in the United States.BMC research notes · 2012Pooled it
119 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2011
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundReducing high blood cholesterol, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in people with and without a past history of coronary heart disease (CHD) is an important goal of pharmacotherapy. Statins are the first-choice agents. Previous reviews of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with coronary artery disease. The case for primary prevention, however, is less clear.
objectivesTo assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of statins in people with no history of CVD. SEARCH STRATEGY: To avoid duplication of effort, we checked reference lists of previous systematic reviews. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (2001 to March 2007) and EMBASE (2003 to March 2007). There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials of statins with minimum duration of one year and follow-up of six months, in adults with no restrictions on their total low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and where 10% or less had a history of CVD, were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included all cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events, combined endpoints (fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events), change in blood total cholesterol concentration, revascularisation, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Relative risk (RR) was calculated for dichotomous data, and for continuous data pooled weighted mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated. MAIN
resultsFourteen randomised control trials (16 trial arms; 34,272 participants) were included. Eleven trials recruited patients with specific conditions (raised lipids, diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria). All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95) as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD endpoints (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79). Benefits were also seen in the reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83). Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects. There was no clear evidence of any significant harm caused by statin prescription or of effects on patient quality of life. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAlthough reductions in all-cause mortality, composite endpoints and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events, there was evidence of selective reporting of outcomes, failure to report adverse events and inclusion of people with cardiovascular disease. Only limited evidence showed that primary prevention with statins may be cost effective and improve patient quality of life. Caution should be taken in prescribing statins for primary prevention among people at low cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.