SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013

Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Fiona Taylor, Mark D Huffman, Ana Filipa Macedo, Theresa H M Moore, Margaret Burke, George Davey Smith, Kirsten Ward, Shah Ebrahim

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 1, favours the comparator in 1. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 579 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.

5numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
579citing papers in PubMed, 25 pooled it
227.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.51 · no effect
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
OR 0.860.79 to 0.94
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
Cardiovascular eventsfavours the comparator · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.620.54 to 0.72
Reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72) was also seen.
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.780.68 to 0.89
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.730.67 to 0.80
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds one cell of the map
RR 0.750.70 to 0.81
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Statins×all-cause mortality

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

14 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 9 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 3 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.880.70 to 1.12
HR 1.000.90 to 1.12
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19
RR 0.990.89 to 1.11

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Cardiac procedures & devices×cardiovascular events

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

3 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 3 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06676683 not yet recruitingstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Statin in Diabetic Patients Not Known to Have Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Low Income Community

Ran2024Enrolled300Registered outcomes1Posted comparisons0ConditionsDiabete Type 2ArmsUsage of Statin in diabetic patients
Open the trial in the graph
NCT05062239 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and the Influence of Statins - Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLars Peter RiberRan2022 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsPostoperative Atrial FibrillationArmsDiscontinuance of treatment with statins 7 to 14 days prior to surgery until 30 days postoperative, No-intervention.
NCT05076019 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Statin Therapy With Atorvastatin in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2022 to 2027Enrolled266ConditionsPostoperative Atrial FibrillationArmsAtorvastatin 80mg, Placebo
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

579 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,829 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Atherosclerosis after pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. [Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in major cardiovascular events: Meta-analysis].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pravastatin for lowering lipids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this map
    Pooled it
  13. Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this map
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

519 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fiona TaylorDepartment of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Fiona.Taylor@lshtm.ac.uk.
Mark D Huffman
Ana Filipa Macedo
Theresa H M Moore
Margaret Burke
George Davey Smith
Kirsten Ward
Shah Ebrahim
University of Bristol · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNorthwestern University · USKing's College London · GBUniversity of Beira Interior · PT

Funding

Department of Health
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundReducing high blood cholesterol, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy. Statins are the first-choice agents. Previous reviews of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD. The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published (2011) and in light of new data an update of this review is required.

objectivesTo assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of statins in people with no history of CVD. SEARCH

methodsTo avoid duplication of effort, we checked reference lists of previous systematic reviews. The searches conducted in 2007 were updated in January 2012. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2022, Issue 4), MEDLINE OVID (1950 to December Week 4 2011) and EMBASE OVID (1980 to 2012 Week 1).There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of statins versus placebo or usual care control with minimum treatment duration of one year and follow-up of six months, in adults with no restrictions on total, low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and where 10% or less had a history of CVD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events, combined endpoints (fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events), revascularisation, change in total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous data, and for continuous data, pooled mean differences (MD) (with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were calculated. We contacted trial authors to obtain missing data. MAIN

resultsThe latest search found four new trials and updated follow-up data on three trials included in the original review. Eighteen randomised control trials (19 trial arms; 56,934 participants) were included. Fourteen trials recruited patients with specific conditions (raised lipids, diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria). All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89). Reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72) was also seen. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects. There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription. Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life. Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta-analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower (< 1% per year) risk of a major cardiovascular event. AUTHORS'

conclusionsReductions in all-cause mortality, major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMyocardial RevascularizationPrimary PreventionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeCholesterol, HDLCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23440795
PMCPMC6481400
OpenAlexW1816597323

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.