SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2013
Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2013. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 1, favours the comparator in 1. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 579 papers, 25 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
Reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72) was also seen.
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×all-cause mortality
SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →14 readable studies in this cell: 4 favour the treatment, 9 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Cardiac procedures & devices×cardiovascular events
ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →3 readable studies in this cell: 2 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of Statin in Diabetic Patients Not Known to Have Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Low Income Community
Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and the Influence of Statins - Randomized Controlled Trial
Statin Therapy With Atorvastatin in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
579 citing papers in PubMed, 25 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,829 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pre-morbid statin use and mortality in trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The role of lipid lowering medications in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of atorvastatin on inflammatory markers, lipid profile, liver enzymes, and pulmonary function in patients with lung diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Atherosclerosis after pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Pooled it
- 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Guideline
- Statins for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: umbrella review of systematic reviews.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Strategies aiming to improve statin therapy adherence in older adults: a systematic review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024 · on this mapPooled it
- [Efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in major cardiovascular events: Meta-analysis].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Pooled it
- Lipid-lowering therapies for cardiovascular disease prevention and management in primary care: PEER umbrella systematic review of systematic reviews.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Pooled it
- Pravastatin for lowering lipids.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for asymptomatic carotid stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · on this mapPooled it
- A systematic review on sex differences in adverse drug reactions related to psychotropic, cardiovascular, and analgesic medications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating the Association Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction and Relative and Absolute Effects of Statin Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA internal medicine · 2022 · on this mapPooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Cardiovascular-Related Diseases from Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Pooled it
- The Cost-Effectiveness of Hyperlipidemia Medication in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review.Global heart · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Associations between statins and adverse events in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review with pairwise, network, and dose-response meta-analyses.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021 · on this mapPooled it
- A systematic review on pharmacokinetics, cardiovascular outcomes and safety profiles of statins in cirrhosis.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
519 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundReducing high blood cholesterol, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy. Statins are the first-choice agents. Previous reviews of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD. The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published (2011) and in light of new data an update of this review is required.
objectivesTo assess the effects, both harms and benefits, of statins in people with no history of CVD. SEARCH
methodsTo avoid duplication of effort, we checked reference lists of previous systematic reviews. The searches conducted in 2007 were updated in January 2012. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (2022, Issue 4), MEDLINE OVID (1950 to December Week 4 2011) and EMBASE OVID (1980 to 2012 Week 1).There were no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials of statins versus placebo or usual care control with minimum treatment duration of one year and follow-up of six months, in adults with no restrictions on total, low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels, and where 10% or less had a history of CVD. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events, combined endpoints (fatal and non-fatal CHD, CVD and stroke events), revascularisation, change in total and LDL cholesterol concentrations, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Odds ratios (OR) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for dichotomous data, and for continuous data, pooled mean differences (MD) (with 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were calculated. We contacted trial authors to obtain missing data. MAIN
resultsThe latest search found four new trials and updated follow-up data on three trials included in the original review. Eighteen randomised control trials (19 trial arms; 56,934 participants) were included. Fourteen trials recruited patients with specific conditions (raised lipids, diabetes, hypertension, microalbuminuria). All-cause mortality was reduced by statins (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94); as was combined fatal and non-fatal CVD RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.81), combined fatal and non-fatal CHD events RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.80) and combined fatal and non-fatal stroke (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.89). Reduction of revascularisation rates (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.72) was also seen. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects. There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription. Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life. Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta-analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower (< 1% per year) risk of a major cardiovascular event. AUTHORS'
conclusionsReductions in all-cause mortality, major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.