Trial reportLancet (London, England)2011

The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with simvastatin plus ezetimibe in patients with chronic kidney disease (Study of Heart and Renal Protection): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Colin Baigent, Martin J Landray, Christina Reith, Jonathan Emberson, David C Wheeler, Charles Tomson, Christoph Wanner, Vera Krane, Alan Cass, Jonathan Craig and 41 more

7 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph read 4 numbers from its abstract, feeding 4 cells of the map: it supports the treatment in 2. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 895 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

4numbers the graph read from it
4cells of the map it votes in
895citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
244.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
Cardiovascular eventsfavours the treatment · head-to-head · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
RR 0.790.68 to 0.93p=0.0036
Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4.6%] vs 230 [5.0%]; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11; p=0.37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2.8%] vs 174 [3.8%]; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6.1%] vs 352 [7.6%]; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; p=0.0036).
Lipidsfavours the treatment · against placebo · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
IRR 0.830.74 to 0.94p=0.0021
Allocation to simvastatin plus ezetimibe yielded an average LDL cholesterol difference of 0.85 mmol/L (SE 0.02; with about two-thirds compliance) during a median follow-up of 4.9 years and produced a 17% proportional reduction in major atherosclerotic events (526 [11.3%] simvastatin plus ezetimibe vs 619 [13.4%] placebo; rate ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.94; log-rank p=0.0021).
Cardiovascular eventsno clear difference · head-to-head · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
RR 0.920.76 to 1.11p=0.37
Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4.6%] vs 230 [5.0%]; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11; p=0.37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2.8%] vs 174 [3.8%]; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6.1%] vs 352 [7.6%]; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; p=0.0036).
Cardiovascular eventsfavours the treatment · head-to-head · ascvd, dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
RR 0.750.60 to 0.94p=0.01
Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4.6%] vs 230 [5.0%]; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.11; p=0.37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2.8%] vs 174 [3.8%]; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p=0.01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6.1%] vs 352 [7.6%]; RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.93; p=0.0036).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Other lipid agents×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

10 readable studies in this cell: 5 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.80established · 4 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2011
RR 0.790.68 to 0.93
NCT0020287818,144 enrolled · 2005
HR 0.940.89 to 0.99
NCT0061899526 enrolled · 2007
Geometric least-squares mean ratio 0.940.77 to 1.14

Statins×cardiovascular events

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

30 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.86replicated · 12 families support, 2 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2011
RR 0.790.68 to 0.93
HR 0.710.56 to 0.90
NCT023442907,769 enrolled · 2015
HR 0.640.48 to 0.84
HR 1.781.00 to 3.17
NCT03944512102 enrolled · 2019
RR 0.670.37 to 1.19

Other lipid agents×lipids

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

28 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 9 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 17 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.50This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
This paper · 2011
IRR 0.830.74 to 0.94

Statins×lipids

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

38 readable studies in this cell: 27 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 6 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 21 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without it
0.50This paper does not move the number.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03480568 phase3recruitingstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Biweekly Alirocumab in Patients on a Stable Dialysis Regimen: The Alidial Study

Ran2018Enrolled20Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsAtherosclerotic Disease, Hemodialysis, Hypercholesterolemia, Peritoneal DialysisArmsAlirocumab 150 MG/ML [Praluent]
Open the trial in the graph
NCT03663049 phase4unknown statusstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Trial of Statin Holiday in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis

Ran2018Enrolled30Registered outcomes5Posted comparisons0ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, ESRDArmsdiscontinue statin
Open the trial in the graph
NCT00125593 phase4completednot on this map

Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP): The Effects of Lowering LDL-cholesterol With Simvastatin 20mg Plus Ezetimibe 10mg in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2003 to 2010Enrolled9,438ConditionsKidney Disease, ChronicArmsSimvastatin 20 mg, Ezetimibe 10mg, Placebo
NCT02863185 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Pitavastatin on Erythrocyte Membrane Fatty Acid Contents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorDong-A UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled45ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseaseArmsPitavastatin, Atorvastatin
NCT02992548 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Pravastatin on Erythrocyte Membrane Fatty Acid Contents in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorDong-A UniversityRan2015 to 2018Enrolled62ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseaseArmsPravastatin
NCT03612778 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Nutritional Intervention for Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Kidney Transplant Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaRan2018 to 2019Enrolled86ConditionsKidney Transplant, ComplicationsArmsPlant-based diet, Mediterranean diet
NCT04659525 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Phase IV Study for Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab Added to Ezetimibe (Standard of Care) in High Cardiovascular Risk Haemodialized Statin Intolerant Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorPoliclinico Casilino ASL RMBRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsHypercholesterolemia, CKD Stage 5, Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic DialysisArmsEvolocumab, Ezetimibe, Placebo
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

895 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2,437 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Benefits and Risks of Antihyperlipidemic Medication in Adults with Different Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Based on the Number Needed to Treat.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024 · on this map
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A Comprehensive, Updated Review of Ezetimibe: Evidence-Based Clinical Use for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

835 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

6 · The record

Corrections and comments

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

51 authors at 20 institutions in 17 countries.

Colin BaigentClinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Martin J Landray
Christina Reith
Jonathan Emberson
David C Wheeler
Charles Tomson
Christoph Wanner
Vera Krane
Alan Cass
Jonathan Craig
Bruce Neal
Lixin Jiang
Lai Seong Hooi
Adeera Levin
Lawrence Agodoa
Mike Gaziano
Bertram Kasiske
Robert Walker
Ziad A Massy
Bo Feldt-Rasmussen
Udom Krairittichai
Vuddidhej Ophascharoensuk
Bengt Fellström
Hallvard Holdaas
Vladimir Tesar
Andrzej Wiecek
Diederick Grobbee
Dick de Zeeuw
Carola Grönhagen-Riska
Tanaji Dasgupta
David Lewis
William Herrington
Marion Mafham
William Majoni
Karl Wallendszus
Richard Grimm
Terje Pedersen
Jonathan Tobert
Jane Armitage
Alex Baxter
Christopher Bray
Yiping Chen
Zhengming Chen
Michael Hill
Carol Knott
Sarah Parish
David Simpson
Peter Sleight
Alan Young
Rory Collins
SHARP Investigators
University of Oxford · GBOslo University Hospital · NOThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Würzburg · DEBerman Center for Outcomes and Clinical Research · USCharles University · CZChiang Mai University · THChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHarvard University · USHelsinki University Hospital · FIInserm · FRJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMedical University of Silesia · PLNational Institutes of Health · USNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRajavithi Hospital · THRoyal Darwin Hospital · AUSultanah Aminah Hospital · MYThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/08/04Medical Research Council MC_EX_G0801669Medical Research Council MC_U137686853Medical Research Council MC_U137686855
8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

backgroundLowering LDL cholesterol with statin regimens reduces the risk of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and the need for coronary revascularisation in people without kidney disease, but its effects in people with moderate-to-severe kidney disease are uncertain. The SHARP trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of simvastatin plus ezetimibe in such patients.

methodsThis randomised double-blind trial included 9270 patients with chronic kidney disease (3023 on dialysis and 6247 not) with no known history of myocardial infarction or coronary revascularisation. Patients were randomly assigned to simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily versus matching placebo. The key prespecified outcome was first major atherosclerotic event (non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death, non-haemorrhagic stroke, or any arterial revascularisation procedure). All analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00125593, and ISRCTN54137607.

findings4650 patients were assigned to receive simvastatin plus ezetimibe and 4620 to placebo. Allocation to simvastatin plus ezetimibe yielded an average LDL cholesterol difference of 0·85 mmol/L (SE 0·02; with about two-thirds compliance) during a median follow-up of 4·9 years and produced a 17% proportional reduction in major atherosclerotic events (526 [11·3%] simvastatin plus ezetimibe vs 619 [13·4%] placebo; rate ratio [RR] 0·83, 95% CI 0·74-0·94; log-rank p=0·0021). Non-significantly fewer patients allocated to simvastatin plus ezetimibe had a non-fatal myocardial infarction or died from coronary heart disease (213 [4·6%] vs 230 [5·0%]; RR 0·92, 95% CI 0·76-1·11; p=0·37) and there were significant reductions in non-haemorrhagic stroke (131 [2·8%] vs 174 [3·8%]; RR 0·75, 95% CI 0·60-0·94; p=0·01) and arterial revascularisation procedures (284 [6·1%] vs 352 [7·6%]; RR 0·79, 95% CI 0·68-0·93; p=0·0036). After weighting for subgroup-specific reductions in LDL cholesterol, there was no good evidence that the proportional effects on major atherosclerotic events differed from the summary rate ratio in any subgroup examined, and, in particular, they were similar in patients on dialysis and those who were not. The excess risk of myopathy was only two per 10,000 patients per year of treatment with this combination (9 [0·2%] vs 5 [0·1%]). There was no evidence of excess risks of hepatitis (21 [0·5%] vs 18 [0·4%]), gallstones (106 [2·3%] vs 106 [2·3%]), or cancer (438 [9·4%] vs 439 [9·5%], p=0·89) and there was no significant excess of death from any non-vascular cause (668 [14·4%] vs 612 [13·2%], p=0·13).

interpretationReduction of LDL cholesterol with simvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg daily safely reduced the incidence of major atherosclerotic events in a wide range of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.

fundingMerck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals; Australian National Health and Medical Research Council; British Heart Foundation; UK Medical Research Council.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAzetidinesCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLConfidence IntervalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationEzetimibeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypolipidemic AgentsKidney Function TestsAzetidinesCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeHypolipidemic AgentsSimvastatin

Identifiers

PMID21663949
PMCPMC3145073
OpenAlexW2134120087

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.