SynthesisLipids in health and disease2024
Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lipids in health and disease, 2024. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 3 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It also reports 5 associations that do not count as treatment evidence, such as RR 1.22 (1.14 to 1.31) for cataract. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against
Regarding safety endpoints, statin use was associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, moderate certainty), but with a greater risk of rhabdomyolysis (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70, low certainty) and cataract (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, moderate certainty).
Statin use compared to no use was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [Relative risk (RR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.96, moderate certainty] and overall mortality (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, low certainty).
Regarding safety endpoints, statin use was associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, moderate certainty), but with a greater risk of rhabdomyolysis (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70, low certainty) and cataract (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, moderate certainty).
Regarding safety endpoints, statin use was associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, moderate certainty), but with a greater risk of rhabdomyolysis (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70, low certainty) and cataract (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, moderate certainty).
Statin use compared to no use was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [Relative risk (RR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.96, moderate certainty] and overall mortality (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, low certainty).
clause the extractor read what became the number
Where it lands on the map
Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.
What it adds to each cell
For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.
Statins×adverse events & safety
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →11 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 7 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×all-cause mortality
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →14 readable studies in this cell: 3 favour the treatment, 9 find no difference, 2 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
Statins×cardiovascular events
No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →30 readable studies in this cell: 18 favour the treatment, 11 find no difference, 1 favour the comparator.
This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Austrian lipid consensus : Interdisciplinary evidence-based recommendations on prevention and treatment of lipid-associated diseases from 15 medical specialist societies].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Post-transplant metabolic dysregulation: Insights and implications for kidney graft survival.World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Hypertriglyceridemia in chronic kidney disease: pathophysiological mechanisms, cardiovascular risk, and emerging therapeutics.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Review
- Metabolic dysregulation and antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: interacting mechanisms and emerging clinical strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Renal Safety Assessment of Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Between Old Certainties and New Questions.Drugs · 2025Review
- Statin Use in Special Populations for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Managing Dyslipidemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: Implications for Cardiovascular and Renal Risk.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Kidney Transplant: More than Immunological Problems.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Kidney Allograft Rejection as an Independent Nontraditional Risk Factor for Post-Transplant Cardiovascular Events.Kidney360 · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.
backgroundDyslipidemia represents an important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, although its optimal management after kidney transplantation remains unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to shed light on the efficacy and safety of statins among kidney transplant recipients, evaluating their potential effects on the risk of cardiovascular events, mortality and graft survival.
methodsMedline, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar were systematically searched from their inception through April 20, 2024. Both randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating the effects of statin administration after kidney transplantation were held eligible. Random-effects models were fitted using the maximum likelihood method, while the certainty of evidence was appraised following the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach.
resultsOverall, 27 studies (10 randomized controlled trials and 17 observational studies) were included. Statin use compared to no use was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [Relative risk (RR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.96, moderate certainty] and overall mortality (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, low certainty). The risk of graft loss did not differ between the compared groups (RR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.48-1.08, very low certainty). Regarding safety endpoints, statin use was associated with a lower risk of hepatotoxicity (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.70-0.93, moderate certainty), but with a greater risk of rhabdomyolysis (RR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.10-1.70, low certainty) and cataract (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.14-1.31, moderate certainty). No statistically significant differences between the compared groups with and without statin use were observed concerning the risk of creatine kinase elevation, post-transplant diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, venous thromboembolism, or cancer.
conclusionsAmong kidney transplant recipients, statin use is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events and better patient survival, presenting an acceptable safety profile. Further large-scale studies are needed to determine the optimal statin dosing strategy and lipid-lowering goals, depending on comorbidities and immunosuppression regimens. REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvok3yzl4o/v1 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.